Home » Developer & Programmer » JDeveloper, Java & XML » performance of OCI vs. thin
performance of OCI vs. thin [message #366644] Wed, 17 May 2000 14:42 Go to next message
Alexander
Messages: 109
Registered: May 2000
Senior Member
Hi, does anyone have advice on the performance differences of JDBC OCI drivers vs. thin drivers. We are running an Apache/JRun and a 8.1.5 on 2 Suns in a cluster environment. Do you think we can gain performance if we install Net8 on the machines and switch from thin to OCI?
TIA
alexander
Re: performance of OCI vs. thin [message #366649 is a reply to message #366644] Tue, 20 June 2000 14:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Frank Naude
Messages: 4569
Registered: April 1998
Senior Member
Hi,

According to Oracle the OCI driver is the fastest. However, in my experience the thin driver beats it ever single time. Maybe you should test both and let us know your results.

Cheers
Frank
Re: performance of OCI vs. thin [message #366660 is a reply to message #366649] Mon, 21 August 2000 06:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Alexander
Messages: 109
Registered: May 2000
Senior Member
i didn't slide by this site too often lately, that's why my reply may be late, but:
frank seems to be absolutely right.
i tested oci vs. thin in the 8.1.6 versions for NT, JDK 1.2.2, and the thin driver was (marginally) faster all the time.
(PS: the setExecuteBatch method did the trick)
Re: performance of OCI vs. thin [message #366723 is a reply to message #366649] Tue, 07 November 2000 15:07 Go to previous message
kobold
Messages: 2
Registered: November 2000
Junior Member
According to my test, OCI are faster on windows NT, but Thin are Faster on Solaris platform!
Previous Topic: can not connect via JRUN to orACLE
Next Topic: CLASSPATH/Resolver SPEC
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jul 31 18:06:16 CDT 2021